Literature Review vs Research Paper: Key Differences Explained
Literature Review vs Research Paper: Essential Differences

Summary
Struggling to understand when to write a literature review versus a research paper? Many students and researchers face this common challenge in academic writing. Our comprehensive guide breaks down the fundamental differences between these two essential scholarly documents, helping you choose the right format for your academic needs. We'll examine how literature reviews synthesize existing knowledge while research papers contribute original findings. You'll learn about their different structures, purposes, and when each is most appropriate in your academic journey.
Plus, we'll show you how visual knowledge management with Scrintal can transform your academic writing process by helping you organize complex information, see connections between sources, and develop more insightful work.
Whether you're writing your first college assignment or preparing advanced academic work, mastering these differences will significantly improve your research and writing outcomes.
Introduction
Are you struggling to understand the difference between a literature review and a research paper? Despite both being common academic assignments, they serve fundamentally different purposes and require distinct approaches.
In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore the key differences between literature reviews and research papers in clear, straightforward language. Whether you're a student working on an assignment, a graduate researcher preparing a thesis, or an academic trying to publish your work, understanding these differences is crucial for your success.
We'll also show you how Scrintal's visual knowledge management platform can revolutionize how you organize your academic research, helping you create better literature reviews and research papers with less stress and more clarity.
What is a Literature Review?
Definition and Purpose
A literature review is a scholarly document that provides a comprehensive overview of existing published research and scholarly material on a specific topic. According to UNT Dallas, it's "an organized discussion of published information like surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources in a particular subject area relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory."
Unlike a simple bibliography or list of sources, a literature review critically evaluates and analyzes what has already been published, identifying patterns, gaps, and connections between different studies.
The primary purposes of a literature review are to:
Summarize and synthesize existing knowledge on a topic
Show what is currently known and what remains unexplored
Identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the research
Establish a theoretical foundation for future research
Demonstrate your familiarity with the current state of knowledge
As one source clearly states: "The overall goal of a review paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a specific topic and to help readers understand the implications of the research for their own work and for the field as a whole."
Types of Literature Reviews
According to our research, literature reviews can take several forms:
Meta-analysis Reviews: These combine and compare results from multiple published studies using statistical methods to identify patterns across studies.
Narrative Reviews: These explore existing research on a topic in a descriptive manner, providing a broad overview of the available literature without rigid methodology.
Systematic Reviews: These follow a strict methodology to find, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. Common in medical and health sciences, they aim to answer the question based on established research.
When to Write a Literature Review
You might need to write a literature review in these scenarios:
As a standalone academic assignment
As a section within a larger research paper or thesis
Before conducting original research to identify gaps
To stay current with developments in your field
As part of a research proposal to establish context
What is a Research Paper?
Definition and Purpose
A research paper is a scholarly document that presents the results, analysis, and interpretation of original research or experimentation conducted by the author. It goes beyond existing knowledge by contributing new findings or insights.
According to the International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management, a research paper "presents the results of original research or experimentation. It is typically written by a researcher or a group of researchers, and it is intended to share new findings or discoveries with the academic community."
The primary purposes of a research paper are to:
Present new findings from original research
Test hypotheses or answer specific research questions
Contribute new knowledge or perspectives to a field
Make an argument supported by evidence and analysis
Advance understanding through original investigation
Types of Research Papers
Research papers typically fall into these categories:
Analytical Research Papers: These examine an issue from a neutral perspective, presenting a clear analysis without necessarily taking a position. As one source notes, "an analytical research paper looks at an issue from a neutral point and gives a clear analysis of the issue."
Argumentative Research Papers: These stake a claim on a subject and use evidence to defend that position. The author takes a clear stance and builds a case to support their viewpoint.
Empirical Research Papers: These present findings based on experiments, surveys, or direct observations, with emphasis on methodology and data analysis.
When to Write a Research Paper
You should create a research paper when:
You've conducted original research through experiments, surveys, or data analysis
You want to contribute new knowledge to your field
You're testing a hypothesis or answering a research question
You're challenging existing theories with new evidence
You're fulfilling an academic assignment that requires original work
Key Differences Between Literature Reviews and Research Papers
Let's explore the fundamental differences between these two academic formats across several key dimensions:
Purpose and Focus
Literature Review:
Focuses on summarizing and synthesizing existing knowledge
Aims to identify patterns, trends, and gaps in current research
Does not present new data or original findings
Maps the intellectual landscape of a topic
Research Paper:
Focuses on presenting new findings from original research
Aims to answer specific questions or test hypotheses
Contributes new data, analysis, or perspectives
Makes an argument based on original evidence
Structure and Content
Literature Review:
Organized by themes, methodological approaches, or chronological developments
Doesn't typically follow the rigid IMRAD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion)
Contains analysis and synthesis of multiple sources
Doesn't include raw data or experimental results
Research Paper:
Usually follows a standardized structure with abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion
Includes detailed methodology explaining how research was conducted
Presents specific results and findings from original work
Contains a literature review section to provide context
Methodology
Literature Review:
Describes methods used to search for and select literature
May evaluate methodologies used in previous studies
Does not involve primary data collection
Research Paper:
Details original methods used to collect and analyze data
Explains experimental design, sample selection, or analytical approaches
Contains specific procedures that could be replicated by others
Conclusions
Literature Review:
Summarizes the current state of knowledge
Identifies areas for future research
Does not claim to add new primary knowledge to the field
Research Paper:
Discusses the significance of new findings
Explains how results contribute to the field
Makes claims about original contributions
As one Reddit user in our source materials succinctly put it: "Lit review = summary. Research paper = argument."
Visual Comparison: Literature Review vs. Research Paper
Feature | Literature Review | Research Paper |
Primary Purpose | Summarizes existing knowledge | Presents new findings |
Main Question | "What is already known?" | "What did I discover?" |
Original Research | Not required | Required |
Structure | Flexible organization by themes/chronology | Standard format (intro, methods, results, discussion) |
Sources | Multiple sources compared and synthesized | Sources used to support new findings |
Contribution | Identifies gaps and patterns | Adds new knowledge |
Length | Typically 3,000-5,000 words | Can range from 3,000-12,000+ words |
Function in Academia | Maps knowledge landscape | Advances knowledge boundaries |
How to Choose Between Writing a Literature Review or Research Paper
Choosing between these formats depends on several factors:
Your Academic Purpose
Choose a literature review if you need to establish what's already known about a topic or identify gaps in existing research.
Choose a research paper if you've conducted original research and want to contribute new findings to your field.
Your Available Resources
Literature reviews require access to existing publications but don't need data collection tools.
Research papers typically require resources for experiments, surveys, or other data collection methods.
Your Time Constraints
Literature reviews can be time-intensive for reading and synthesis but don't require data collection time.
Research papers require time for both literature review and conducting original research.
Your Assignment Requirements
Check your instructor's guidelines carefully—sometimes what's called a "research paper" still emphasizes literature synthesis.
Consider whether you're expected to contribute new knowledge or summarize existing information.
Organizing Your Academic Work with Scrintal
Whether you're writing a literature review or research paper, effective organization is crucial. This is where Scrintal's visual knowledge management platform can significantly enhance your workflow.
Visual Organization for Literature Reviews
Literature reviews require synthesizing information from multiple sources, identifying patterns, and making connections—tasks that align perfectly with Scrintal's visual canvas capabilities.
With Scrintal, you can:
Create visual maps of related studies on an infinite canvas
Group sources by themes, methodologies, or chronology
Draw visual connections between related concepts or contradicting findings
Maintain a comprehensive overview of all your sources while diving deep into specific areas
The platform's bidirectional linking feature is particularly useful for literature reviews, allowing you to connect related ideas across your knowledge base, similar to Wikipedia pages but with visual representation of the connections.
Streamlining Research Paper Development
For research papers, Scrintal offers powerful features to organize your original research alongside supporting literature:
Create separate but connected spaces for your literature review, methodology, results, and discussion
Embed multimedia content directly on your canvas, including images of experimental results
Use "floating tabs" to keep reference materials visible while writing your analysis
Maintain connections between your findings and existing literature that supports or contrasts with them
Coming Soon: AI-Powered Research Assistance
Scrintal is developing an AI Assistant that will further enhance your academic writing process. This tool will help you:
Brainstorm ideas and research questions
Summarize complex articles and findings
Transform your visual boards into cohesive reports
Maintain your unique voice while benefiting from AI assistance
As stated in Scrintal's materials: "We designed the AI assistant to work alongside you. You have complete control over your ideas, while AI helps you brainstorm, summarise your ideas, and even turns your boards into reports for you."
Want to be among the first to experience these advanced features? Join the waitlist for Scrintal's AI Research Assistant.
Best Practices for Writing Literature Reviews
To create an effective literature review, consider these best practices from academic writing centers:
Organization Strategies
Choose an appropriate organizational approach:
Chronological: Organize sources by publication date to show how understanding has evolved
Thematic: Group sources by common themes or topics
Methodological: Organize sources by research methods they employed
Create a clear structure:
Introduction: Define your topic and explain why this review matters
Body: Present your synthesis of the literature using your chosen organizational approach
Conclusion: Summarize key findings and identify gaps for future research
Synthesize, don't just summarize:
Go beyond listing what each source says
Identify relationships between studies
Discuss how studies build upon or contradict each other
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Lack of critical evaluation: Don't simply accept all published findings as valid—assess methodologies and conclusions critically.
Too many direct quotes: Use your own words to demonstrate understanding, with quotes used sparingly.
Not describing search procedures: Explain how you identified and selected the literature you're reviewing.
Confirmation bias: Don't only include research that supports your viewpoint—consider contrary findings.
Best Practices for Writing Research Papers
When creating a research paper, keep these best practices in mind:
Organization Strategies
Follow the standard structure:
Abstract: A brief summary of your entire paper
Introduction: Background information and your research question
Literature review: Context of existing research
Methodology: How you conducted your research
Results: What you found
Discussion: What your findings mean
Conclusion: Summary and implications of your research
Develop a strong thesis statement:
Clearly articulate the main argument or finding of your paper
Ensure it's specific and supported by your research
Connect your findings to existing literature:
Show how your research fills gaps identified in previous studies
Discuss how your findings support or challenge existing theories
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Inadequate literature review: Don't neglect to thoroughly review related work.
Unclear methodology: Provide enough detail that others could replicate your study.
Overstating conclusions: Be honest about the limitations of your research.
Poor integration of sources: Ensure citations support rather than replace your original ideas.
Conclusion: Choosing the Right Format for Your Academic Needs
Understanding the differences between literature reviews and research papers is essential for academic success. While literature reviews synthesize existing knowledge to identify patterns and gaps, research papers contribute new findings through original investigation.
Both formats play vital roles in advancing knowledge. Literature reviews map the current state of understanding, while research papers push those boundaries forward. By recognizing when to use each format, you'll be better equipped to contribute meaningfully to academic discourse.
With Scrintal's visual knowledge management platform, you can organize your academic work more effectively, whether you're connecting ideas across multiple sources for a literature review or linking your original research to existing knowledge. The visual canvas approach helps clarify thinking, identify connections, and ultimately produce more insightful academic writing.
Ready to transform how you organize your academic research? Try Scrintal today and experience the power of visual knowledge management for your literature reviews and research papers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a literature review and a research paper?
A literature review summarizes and synthesizes existing knowledge on a topic, while a research paper presents new findings from original research. Literature reviews focus on what's already known, while research papers contribute new knowledge through experiments, analysis, or theoretical development.
How do I differentiate between a research paper and a review paper?
Research papers present original findings and include detailed methodology sections describing how data was collected and analyzed. Review papers don't contain original research but instead analyze and synthesize what's already published on a topic.
What are the 5 C's of a literature review?
The 5 C's of a literature review are: Citation (properly attributing sources), Comparison (showing relationships between studies), Contrast (highlighting differences), Critique (evaluating strengths and weaknesses), and Connection (linking studies to your research question).
What is the difference between a literature review and a research proposal?
A literature review synthesizes existing research on a topic, while a research proposal outlines a plan for conducting new research. A literature review is often included within a research proposal to provide context and justification for the proposed study.
What is a literature review in a research paper example?
In a research paper, the literature review typically appears after the introduction and before the methodology section. It provides context by summarizing relevant studies, identifying key theories, and highlighting gaps that your research addresses. For instance, in a research paper on climate change impacts on agriculture, the literature review would summarize existing studies on climate patterns, crop yields, and adaptation strategies before presenting your new research.
Daiana Moyano
Unlock brilliance
Company
Guides
Comparisons