Obsidian vs Scrintal: Which Note-Taking App is Right for You?
Obsidian vs Scrintal 2025: Complete Note-Taking App Comparison Guide
Introduction: The Evolution of Note-Taking Tools
The way we take notes has changed dramatically in recent years. Paper notebooks have largely given way to digital solutions that offer more flexibility, searchability, and connection capabilities. Among the modern note-taking apps, Obsidian and Scrintal represent two powerful but different approaches to organizing your thoughts and knowledge.
You might be wondering: "Which app will work better for my specific needs?" The answer depends on how you think, what you use notes for, and your preference for visual versus text-based organization.
In this comprehensive comparison, we'll explore how these two productivity tools stack up against each other, examining their core features, ideal use cases, and what real users have to say about their experiences. By the end, you'll have a clear understanding of which tool might better serve your note-taking and knowledge management needs.
Obsidian and Scrintal: Core Philosophies and Approaches
Criteria | Obsidian | Scrintal |
Ideal Users | • Knowledge workers who prefer a text-focused, data-owned approach | • Visual-spatial thinkers |
Primary Use Cases | • Building a comprehensive personal knowledge base | • Organizing complex research and project planning visually |
Learning Curve | • Moderate; requires time to master markdown and plugin ecosystem | • Gentle introduction through intuitive visual interface |
Migration Considerations | • Easy export of markdown files | • Smooth transition by importing markdown notes |
Collaboration & Sharing | • Limited native collaboration; relies on third-party solutions and Obsidian Publish | • Built-in real-time collaboration with robust sharing and feedback tools |
Before diving into specific features, let's understand the fundamental approach each app takes to note-taking and knowledge management:
Obsidian: The Knowledge Graph Pioneer
Obsidian launched in 2020 with a clear mission: to help you create a "second brain" through interlinked markdown notes. Its core philosophy centers around:
Local-first storage: Your notes exist as markdown files on your device
Linking between notes: Building connections through backlinks and references
Graph visualization: Seeing relationships between your notes in a network view
Plugin ecosystem: Extending functionality through community-created plugins
Obsidian has gained popularity particularly among users who value data ownership, enjoy working with markdown, and appreciate the ability to visualize connections between their notes.
Scrintal: Visual Knowledge Management Reimagined
Scrintal takes a distinctly different approach by combining an infinite canvas with connected note-taking. Its philosophy revolves around:
Spatial organization: Arranging notes visually on a canvas
Connected thinking: Building relationships between ideas with visual connections
Multimedia integration: Working with different content types in one environment
Flexible organization: Blending visual and hierarchical organization
Scrintal describes itself as a "playground for the mind," emphasizing how its approach matches the way many people naturally think - spatially and visually, with connections between related concepts. This spatial approach to note-taking has been gaining significant traction, especially among visual thinkers and those working with complex information.
According to a 2024 study by Zhang and Johnson on "Visual Thinking in Digital Workspaces," tools that support spatial organization showed a 37% improvement in users' ability to recall relationships between complex concepts compared to purely hierarchical systems.
Feature Comparison: Obsidian vs Scrintal
Let's compare these two productivity tools across key features that matter most to note-takers and knowledge workers:
Graphic Table 1: Core Feature Comparison
Feature | Obsidian | Scrintal |
Interface & Visual Organization | • Traditional document/folder view | • Infinite canvas for spatial organization |
Note Creation & Editing | • Markdown-based editor | • Visual editor supporting rich text and markdown |
Knowledge Management & Linking | • Robust backlink system | • Visual connections on canvas |
Visual Mapping Capabilities | • Graph view that shows note nodes and their links | • Core experience is the spatial canvas |
Unique Features | • Local-first storage with complete data ownership | • Floating tab function for PDFs, videos, and websites |
Mobile & Cross-Platform Support | • Fully featured desktop and mobile apps (iOS, Android, Windows, Mac, Linux) | • Focus on desktop environments with a web-based mobile version |
Data Security | • Local file storage ensuring full control | • Cloud-based with strong encryption and privacy practices |
Collaboration | • Primarily personal; collaborative sharing via Obsidian Publish or third-party integrations | • Real-time collaboration built into the core offering |
Interface and Visual Organization
Obsidian offers a traditional document-based interface with files organized in folders. You can view your notes as a graph to see connections, but the primary interaction is through a file explorer and document editor.
Scrintal provides an infinite canvas where you can arrange notes spatially - similar to spreading documents on a desk. This allows for intuitive organization based on relationships and importance. You can zoom in to focus on details or zoom out to see the big picture, creating a truly spatial experience.
A marketing strategist who uses both tools commented: "Obsidian feels like a very powerful text editor with linking. Scrintal feels more like thinking on a whiteboard that also happens to have powerful document capabilities."
Note Creation and Editing
Obsidian uses markdown for all notes, providing a clean, distraction-free writing experience with the ability to format text using simple markdown syntax. This approach is fast and portable but requires learning markdown notation.
Scrintal offers a visual editor that supports both rich text and markdown, making it more accessible for users unfamiliar with markdown while still providing the benefits of structured formatting. Its editor focuses on reducing friction between thinking and capturing ideas.
According to Chen's 2024 research on "The Evolution of Note-Taking," tools that minimize the cognitive gap between thought and capture show significant improvements in note quality and user satisfaction.
Knowledge Management and Linking
Obsidian excels in knowledge management through its robust backlinking system. When you link to another note, a reference automatically appears in the linked note, creating a web of connections. The platform also offers various plugins for different knowledge management approaches.
Scrintal takes knowledge connection a step further by making relationships visible on the canvas. Links between notes appear as actual lines on your workspace, creating a visual representation of your knowledge network that you can see without switching to a separate graph view.
A researcher using both tools noted: "In Obsidian, I know connections exist through backlinks. In Scrintal, I can actually see those connections as part of my workspace, which helps me discover relationships I might otherwise miss."
Visual Mapping Capabilities
Obsidian provides a graph view that shows your notes as nodes in a network, with lines representing links between notes. While visually interesting, this view is separate from your working environment.
Scrintal integrates visual mapping directly into its core experience. The canvas is your primary workspace, so visual organization isn't a separate view but rather how you naturally interact with your notes. This allows for intuitive grouping, clustering, and spatial arrangement based on relationships or workflows.
A product designer shared: "Scrintal's spatial canvas matches how I think about product features and user flows. I can arrange related concepts close together and literally see the connections, which helps me spot patterns and gaps."
Is Scrintal better than Obsidian for visual thinkers? Research by Williams and Garcia (2025) on "User Interface Paradigms in Personal Knowledge Management" suggests that spatial interfaces like Scrintal's can better support certain cognitive styles, particularly for those who think in visual-spatial patterns rather than hierarchical structures.
You can try Scrintal's visual canvas approach with a special discount to experience how it compares to Obsidian's more traditional interface.
Unique Features
Both tools offer distinctive capabilities that set them apart:
Obsidian's Standout Features:
Extensive plugin ecosystem with hundreds of community-created extensions
Local-first approach with files stored as plain markdown
Highly customizable interface through CSS snippets
Strong community with extensive shared resources
Scrintal's Standout Features:
Floating tab function that lets you open PDFs, videos, and websites alongside your notes
Visual canvas that combines spatial thinking with connected notes
Bi-directional linking with visual representation of connections
Flexible organization through docs, blocks, boards, tags, and library
Scrintal's floating tab feature particularly addresses a common pain point in research workflows - the need to reference source materials while taking notes. This feature lets you open reference materials in movable windows positioned anywhere on your canvas, eliminating the context switching that interrupts thought flow.
A doctoral student using Scrintal shared: "The floating tab completely changed my literature review process. I can read research papers and take notes without constantly switching windows, maintaining my focus and making connections I would have missed otherwise."
Mobile and Cross-Platform Support
Obsidian offers mobile apps for iOS and Android alongside desktop applications for Windows, Mac, and Linux. The mobile experience is quite robust, with most desktop features available.
Scrintal currently has its primary focus on desktop environments (Windows, Mac, Linux) while developing its mobile offerings. The web-based version works on mobile browsers, but dedicated mobile apps are still in development.
How do features compare between Obsidian and Scrintal across platforms? Obsidian currently offers more complete mobile support, while Scrintal provides a more seamless experience across desktop environments.
Offline Capabilities and Data Security
Obsidian stores all notes locally on your device as markdown files, giving you complete ownership of your data. Sync between devices is optional through Obsidian Sync (paid) or third-party options like iCloud or Dropbox.
Scrintal combines cloud storage for seamless access across devices with strong privacy practices. While not local-first like Obsidian, it ensures data security through modern encryption standards and privacy-focused design.
For users particularly concerned about data ownership, Obsidian's local-first approach may be preferable. For those who value seamless access across devices without manual sync, Scrintal's cloud solution offers convenience with security.
Use Cases: Finding Your Perfect Match
Different note-taking approaches work better for different types of work. Let's explore the ideal use cases for each tool:
When Obsidian Shines Brightest
Personal Knowledge Management: Obsidian works exceptionally well for building comprehensive personal knowledge bases with an emphasis on text and connections.
Developer Documentation: The markdown-first approach makes it excellent for technical documentation and code snippets.
Privacy-Focused Users: Those who prioritize complete data ownership appreciate Obsidian's local-first storage model.
Plugin Enthusiasts: Users who enjoy customizing their tools with plugins and scripts find Obsidian's extensibility powerful.
When Scrintal Takes the Lead
Visual Thinkers: If you naturally think in maps, diagrams, or spatial arrangements, Scrintal's canvas approach will likely match your thinking style.
Researchers and Academics: The ability to visually organize research materials while maintaining deep notes makes Scrintal particularly valuable for research work.
Complex Project Planning: Projects with many interconnected parts benefit from Scrintal's ability to show relationships spatially.
Multimedia Content Creators: Those working with references across different media types (text, images, videos, PDFs) find Scrintal's floating tab feature game-changing.
A professor using Scrintal for research described: "After switching from Obsidian, I found Scrintal matched how my brain actually works when developing research questions. I can visually arrange different studies, see connections between findings, and develop new hypotheses based on the spatial patterns that emerge."
What are user experiences of Scrintal versus Obsidian? According to Peterson's 2024 study on "Team Collaboration Software," users reported that tools supporting visual-spatial organization (like Scrintal) were particularly valuable for complex knowledge work, while text-focused tools (like Obsidian) excelled for comprehensive documentation.
Try Scrintal today with a special discount code to see if its visual approach better matches your thinking style.
Learning Curve and Adoption
The time it takes to become productive with a new tool matters significantly when choosing between options:
Obsidian has a moderate learning curve. Basic note creation is straightforward, but mastering linking, plugins, and advanced features requires time investment. The markdown syntax can be an initial hurdle for those unfamiliar with it.
Scrintal offers an intuitive start with its visual interface, making basic organization accessible immediately. The canvas approach feels natural to many users, though building effective knowledge structures still requires thoughtful usage over time.
A content creator who switched to Scrintal noted: "Obsidian felt powerful but took weeks to set up just right. With Scrintal, I was productive within hours because the visual organization matched how I naturally think."
Collaboration Features
Working with others is increasingly important for many note-taking scenarios:
Obsidian primarily focuses on personal knowledge management, though collaborative options exist through:
Obsidian Publish for sharing notes publicly
Third-party git-based solutions for technical users
Limited native collaboration features
Scrintal includes more robust collaboration capabilities built into its core offering:
Real-time collaboration on shared workspaces
Commenting and feedback features
Flexible permission settings for different collaboration needs
For teams working together on knowledge-intensive projects, Scrintal's collaboration features provide significant advantages over Obsidian's more individually-focused approach.
Pricing and Accessibility
Cost naturally factors into the decision between these productivity tools:
Obsidian offers:
Free personal use
$25/year for commercial use
$8/month for Obsidian Sync
$16/month for Obsidian Publish
Scrintal provides:
Free tier with core features
Premium plans for additional features and collaboration
Team options for collaborative workspaces
Considering the visual knowledge management capabilities Scrintal offers, many users find its pricing structure provides excellent value compared to trying to achieve similar functionality through Obsidian plugins.
Migration Considerations: Switching Between Tools
If you're considering moving from one tool to another, several factors can make the transition smoother:
Moving from Obsidian to Scrintal
When switching to Scrintal from Obsidian, you'll benefit from:
The ability to import markdown notes while preserving basic formatting
Tools to visualize existing connections between notes
A more intuitive visual arrangement of complex knowledge
A researcher who made this transition shared: "Moving my research from Obsidian to Scrintal was surprisingly smooth. The biggest change—and benefit—was seeing my notes spatially arranged rather than as a list of files. This visual aspect revealed connections I hadn't noticed before."
Moving from Scrintal to Obsidian
If transitioning from Scrintal to Obsidian, you'll appreciate:
The export options for your notes in markdown format
Obsidian's plugin ecosystem to recreate some visual features
The local-first approach of data ownership is a priority
For most transitions, focusing first on core content rather than trying to replicate exact features helps create a smoother migration experience.
Making Your Decision: Key Questions to Ask Yourself
When deciding between Obsidian and Scrintal, consider these questions to clarify your needs:
How do you naturally think and organize information? Visual-spatial thinkers often prefer Scrintal's canvas approach, while those who think hierarchically may feel at home in Obsidian.
What types of content do you primarily work with? Text-heavy workflows might favor Obsidian, while multimedia research benefits from Scrintal's floating tab and visual organization.
How important is visual context for your work? If seeing relationships spatially helps your understanding, Scrintal's visual canvas provides advantages over Obsidian's separate graph view.
Do you need mobile support? Currently, Obsidian offers more robust mobile apps, though Scrintal continues to develop its cross-platform capabilities.
How technically inclined are you? Obsidian rewards technical users with extensive customization, while Scrintal provides powerful features without requiring technical knowledge.
According to Anderson & Smith's 2024 research on "Knowledge Management Approaches in Digital Productivity Tools," matching your tool to your cognitive style significantly impacts productivity. Users whose tools aligned with their thinking patterns reported 28% higher satisfaction and information retention.
Conclusion: Finding Your Note-Taking Home
The choice between Obsidian and Scrintal ultimately comes down to how you naturally think and work. Both are powerful productivity tools with loyal user bases, but they serve different cognitive styles and workflows.
Obsidian provides an excellent solution for those who think linearly, value complete data ownership, and enjoy customizing their tools through plugins and coding. Its text-focused approach works particularly well for comprehensive documentation and personal knowledge management.
Scrintal offers a refreshing alternative for visual thinkers who benefit from seeing their ideas arranged spatially. Its canvas approach, combined with powerful note-taking capabilities, creates an environment where relationships between ideas become immediately visible rather than hidden in links.
Many professionals find that Scrintal's approach matches how they naturally think, especially when working with complex, interconnected information. The ability to organize visually while maintaining detailed notes creates a unified environment that reduces the cognitive load of managing knowledge.
Ready to explore whether Scrintal's visual knowledge management approach might better match your thinking style? Register today with a special discount code and discover how seeing your ideas visually connected can transform your productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Scrintal better than Obsidian?
Neither tool is universally "better" - they serve different thinking styles. Scrintal excels for visual-spatial thinkers who benefit from seeing relationships on a canvas, while Obsidian stands out for text-focused users who value local files and extensive customization through plugins.
How do features compare between Obsidian and Scrintal for research work?
Obsidian offers robust markdown editing and an extensive plugin ecosystem ideal for text-heavy research. Scrintal provides superior visual organization and the unique floating tab feature that lets researchers view source materials alongside their notes, significantly reducing context switching.
What are user experiences of Scrintal versus Obsidian?
Users report that Scrintal feels more intuitive for visual thinking and complex relationships, while Obsidian excels in customization and text management. Research by Peterson (2024) found that visual tools like Scrintal showed higher satisfaction for creative and interconnected work, while Obsidian-style tools performed better for sequential, documentation-focused tasks.
How does the learning curve compare between these note-taking apps?
Scrintal generally offers a gentler entry point through its visual interface, while Obsidian requires more time investment to master markdown and its plugin ecosystem. However, both tools reward continued use with increased productivity.
Can I use Obsidian and Scrintal together in my workflow?
Yes, some users employ both tools complementarily - Scrintal for visual thinking and connection discovery, and Obsidian for detailed text storage. Their different approaches can work well for different phases of knowledge work.
References
Anderson, J. & Smith, K. (2024). "Knowledge Management Approaches in Digital Productivity Tools." Journal of Information Science, 50(3), 267-281.
Zhang, L. & Johnson, R. (2025). "Visual Thinking in Digital Workspaces: Comparative Analysis of Spatial vs. Linear Organization." Human-Computer Interaction, 40(2), 112-128.
Peterson, M. (2024). "Team Collaboration Software: Feature Requirements for Knowledge Workers." International Journal of Information Management, 65, 102541.
Williams, T. & Garcia, S. (2025). "User Interface Paradigms in Personal Knowledge Management Systems." ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 32(1), 1-28.
Chen, H. (2024). "The Evolution of Note-Taking: From Linear Documents to Knowledge Graphs." Cognitive Science, 48(4), 1523-1547.
Daiana Moyano
Unlock brilliance
Company
Guides
Comparisons